Rotating

Decision Making Style

Cognitive biases in Decision Making

Horizontal Divider 29

Home | Decision Making Style | 7 Phases of Decision Making | Approaches in Decision Making | Individual vs. Group | Decision Making Techniques | Problem Solving et al. | Personality and Values in Decision Making | Abilene Paradox | Decision Rules and Levels | Organizational Decision Making | Improving Decision Making | Webliography | Web Designers Page

According to Myers (1962), a person's decision making process depends to a significant degree on their cognitive style. Starting from the work of Carl Jung, Myers developed a set of four bi-polar dimensions. The terminal points on these dimensions are: thinking and feeling; extroversion and introversion; judgment and perception; and sensing and intuition. He claimed that a person's decision making style is based largely on how they score on these four dimensions.

Horizontal Divider 26

pic9.jpg

Cognitive biases in Decision Making

  • -Selective search for evidence
  • -Premature selection of search of evidence
  • -Experiential limitations
  • -Selective Perception
  • -Wishful Thinking
  • -Recency
  • -Anchoring and adjustment
  • -Group Think
  • -Source credibility bias
  • -Incremental decision making and escalating commitment
  • -Inconsistency
  • -Attribution Assymetry
  • -Role fulfillment
  • -Underestimating uncertainty and the illusion of control
  • -Faulty generalizations
  • -Ascrption of causality

Decision Style
__________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Differences between people with respect to their orientations towards decisions.
 
Decision Style Model
 
1. Directive
  • prefer simple , clear solutions
  • make decisions rapidly
  • do not consider many alternatives
  • rely on existing rules

2. Analytical

  • prefer complex problems
  • carefully analyze alternatives
  • enjoy solving problems
  • willing to use innovative methods

3. Conceptual

  • socailly oriented
  • humanistic and artistic approach
  • solveproblems creaively
  • enjoy new ideas

4. Behavioral

  • concept for their organizations
  • interest in helping others
  • open to suggestion
  • rely on meetings

 

 Details!

 

  • Selective search for evidence - We tend to be willing to gather facts that support certain conclusions but disregard other facts that support different conclusions.
  • Premature termination of search for evidence - We tend to accept the first alternative that looks like it might work.
  • Conservatism and inertia - Unwillingness to change thought patterns that we have used in the past in the face of new circumstances.
  • Experiential limitations - Unwillingness or inability to look beyond the scope of our past experiences; rejection of the unfamiliar.
  • Selective perception - We actively screen-out information that we do not think is salient.
  • Wishful thinking or optimism - We tend to want to see things in a positive light and this can distort our perception and thinking.
  • Recency - We tend to place more attention on more recent information and either ignore or forget more distant information. (
  • Repetition bias - A willingness to believe what we have been told most often and by the greatest number of different of sources.
  • Anchoring and adjustment - Decisions are unduly influenced by initial information that shapes our view of subsequent information.
  • Group think - Peer pressure to conform to the opinions held by the group.
  • Source credibility bias - We reject something if we have a bias against the person, organization, or group to which the person belongs: We are inclined to accept a statement by someone we like.
  • Incremental decision making and escalating commitment  - We look at a decision as a small step in a process and this tends to perpetuate a series of similar decisions. This can be contrasted with zero-based decision making. Inconsistency - The unwillingness to apply the same decision criteria in similar situations.
  • Attribution asymmetry - We tend to attribute our success to our abilities and talents, but we attribute our failures to bad luck and external factors. We attribute other's success to good luck, and their failures to their mistakes.
  • Role fulfillment - We conform to the decision making expectations that others have of someone in our position.
  • Underestimating uncertainty and the illusion of control - We tend to underestimate future uncertainty because we tend to believe we have more control over events than we really do. We believe we have control to minimize potential problems in our decisions.
  • Faulty generalizations - In order to simplify an extremely complex world, we tend to group things and people. These simplifying generalizations can bias decision making processes.
  • Ascription of causality - We tend to ascribe causation even when the evidence only suggests correlation. Just because birds fly to the equatorial regions when the trees lose their leaves, does not mean that the birds migrate because the trees lose their leaves.

Horizontal Divider 29

pic8.jpg

The website is done by Carmela Dalisay and Carolyn  Nazareno and Argie Lyne Molina as a project in Decision Making subject. We hope to help other students and researchers. Thank you for visiting our sites, hope it will help you a lot in your research.